![]() ![]() A Roadmap of the Paradoxical Mind: Expanding Cognitive Theories on Organizational Paradox, Josh Keller and Erica Wen Chen 4. Psychoanalytic Theory, Emotion and Organizational Paradox, Michael Jarrett and Russ Vince 3. Ad Fontes: Philosophical Foundations of Paradox Research, Jonathan Schad 2. ![]() Oxford: OUP.Table of contents : Foreword, Bob Quinn and Mrudula Nujella, Introduction, Wendy Smith, Marianne Lewis, Paula Jarzabkowski, and Ann Langley Part I: Foundations and Approaches 1. McBrayer (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to natural theology (pp. Collective choice and social welfare (2nd ed.). Christ and Horrors: The coherence of christology. Horrendous Evils and the goodness of god. Can god satisfice? American Philosophical Quarterly, 50, 399–410. Byron (Ed.), Satisficing and maximizing: Moral theorists on practical reason. ![]() How an unsurpassable being can create a surpassable world. Petersburg, Saint Peter’s Offer, and Satan’s Apple. New Haven: Yale University Press.īartha, P., Barker, J., & Hajek, A. Social choice and individual values (2nd ed.). Bayesianism, infinite decisions, and binding. And clearly, in the case we care about, objective values (if any there be) are involved.Īrntzenius, F., Elga, A., & Hawthorne, J. Hurka ( 2004) presses a line similar to this one in arguing that satisficing only seems desirable when ‘subjective’ values are concerned. But living in a good world is no excuse for poor behavior. So I am free to behave as badly as I please. The rest of the multiverse is so good that even if I kill everyone I can - producing a large net negative of evil - enough wonderful disconnected universes should be able to balance it off. Perhaps I inhabit a large multiverse, an infinity of individual universes within which surpass the threshhold, but in which there are only a few people in my own spacetime. Suppose my world is very good, so good that nothing I can do could push it below the threshold. Coupled with the ordinal structure of the goodness of worlds, this will make finding infinitely-ascending chains of worlds below this one to construct something like a modified blank check case difficult. Perhaps we simply choose a world as ‘good enough,’ and allow any action that leaves the world as good as or better than that world. We could, as the Howard-Snyeders do, try more sophisticated definitions of the threshold. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |